Suchergebnisse
Filter
18 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
Climate Simulation, Uncertainty, and Policy Advice – The Case of the IPCC
In: Climate Change and Policy, S. 91-111
Book Review: In and About the World: Philosophical Studies of Science and Technology
In: Science, technology, & human values: ST&HV, Band 24, Heft 1, S. 170-173
ISSN: 1552-8251
Multilevel governance of antimicrobial resistance risks: a literature review
In: Journal of risk research: the official journal of the Society for Risk Analysis Europe and the Society for Risk Analysis Japan, Band 25, Heft 8, S. 945-958
ISSN: 1466-4461
Exploring the transition potential of renewable energy communities
In: Futures, Band 66, S. 85-95
Exploring the impact of the IPCC Assessment Reports on science
In: Environmental science & policy, Band 14, Heft 8, S. 1052-1061
ISSN: 1462-9011
Stakeholder participation in environmental knowledge production
In: Futures, Band 42, Heft 3, S. 254-264
Stakeholder participation in environmental knowledge production
In: Futures: the journal of policy, planning and futures studies, Band 42, Heft 3, S. 254-264
The practice of transition management: Examples and lessons from four distinct cases
In: Futures: the journal of policy, planning and futures studies, Band 42, Heft 3, S. 237-247
ISSN: 0016-3287
The shaping of anticipation: The networked development of inferential capacity in governing Southeast Asian deltas
In: Earth system governance, Band 7, S. 100089
ISSN: 2589-8116
How networked organisations build capacity for anticipatory governance in South East Asian deltas
In: Futures, Band 116, S. 102512
Expert Views on Their Role as Policy Advisor: Pilot Study for the Cases of Electromagnetic Fields, Particulate Matter, and Antimicrobial Resistance
In: Risk analysis: an international journal, Band 39, Heft 5, S. 968-974
ISSN: 1539-6924
AbstractThis perspective presents empirical data to demonstrate the existence of different expert views on scientific policy advice on complex environmental health issues. These views are partly research‐field specific. According to scientific literature, experts differ in the way they provide policy advice on complex issues such as electromagnetic fields (EMF), particulate matter (PM), and antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Where some experts feel their primary task is to carry out fundamental research, others actively engage in the policy dialogue. Although the literature provides ideas about expert roles, there exists little empirical underpinning. Our aim is to gather empirical evidence about expert roles. The results of an international study indicated that experts on EMF, PM, and AMR differ in the way they view their role in the policy dialogue. For example, experts differed in their views on the need for precaution and their motivation to initiate stakeholder cooperation. Besides, most experts thought that their views on the risks of EMF/PM/AMR did not differ from those of colleagues. Great dissensus was found in views on the best ways of managing risks and uncertainties. In conclusion, the theoretical ideal–typical roles from the literature can be identified to a certain extent.
Differences in views of experts about their role in particulate matter policy advice: Empirical evidence from an international expert consultation
In: Environmental science & policy, Band 59, S. 44-52
ISSN: 1462-9011
The reflective futures practitioner: Balancing salience, credibility and legitimacy in generating foresight knowledge with stakeholders
In: Futures, Band 66, S. 1-12
Roles of scientists as policy advisers on complex issues: A literature review
In: Environmental science & policy, Band 40, S. 16-25
ISSN: 1462-9011